Performance Management
This weeks case revolves around a case where a self described “good employee” was blindsided by a poor performance evaluation and subsequently felt a sense of resentment and reduced morale. After the employee lodged a complaint to upper management, a series of performance goals were drafted and a plan implemented. Thus setting defined, achievable objectives for the employee and opening a productive ongoing dialogue between manager and subordinate. The case article can be found here.
Performance appraisals are important for both employee and employer. This process allows organisations an opportunity to improve efficiency, maintain a paper trail in the case of possible litigation, and give managers another tool for achieving goals. From the employee’s perspective it allows for constructive feedback, a metric to measure improvement, and fair tool to assess salary increases and/or other incentives.
A model of the basic components of a performance appraisal. (Gomez-Meija et al., 2016)
Focus on what’s important to the job
Identifying the required dimensions of performance for a particular job is crucial for developing an effective performance appraisal strategy. Without a solid understanding of the parameters of the specific job and the competencies required achievement, a performance appraisal can become just another workplace hassle, or worse, a source of resentment and conflict for all parties involved.
Lets briefly take a look a few ways to implement productive and strategic employee performance management that benefits both employer and employee.
Relative Judgment
This method entails ranking each employee working in similar capacities. This strategy can be helpful for managers to help differentiate employees and truly weigh their competencies, but comes with some serious issues. On issue is relative judgement forces a manager to decide which employee “wins” and which employee “loses”, when both may be equally competent. Another problem is that the only real metric for achievement is the top of the list and the employee at the very bottom may still be a valuable member of the team but will be evaluated unfairly. The polar nature of a straightforward ranking may unduly punish some and encourage complacency from others.
Absolute Judgment
This system tasks a manager to evaluate each individual against predetermined benchmarks. This allows employees from different areas to be judged against each other and allows for two employees to achieve the same marks without need for “winners” or “losers”. Although this system is significantly less flawed than the relative judgment method, it still has its downfalls.
One issue is people may be evaluated very differently from manager to manager. Another issue is a manager may just give everyone the same evaluation to avoid conflict or rely too heavily on comparative judgments of other employees.
Trait Appraisal
This approach measures positive employee traits, such as reliability or motivation, on a numerical scale. This system may suffer from similar drawbacks as the absolute judgement system, where people may be evaluated differently manager to manager. Unlike the absolute judgement method, it also suffers from being ambiguous in its methodology and does not present clear targets for the employee to meet and may be difficult to defend if legally challenged.
Behavioral Appraisal
A series of individual behaviors that an employee may engage in and their relation to the employee's actual observed work habits. This methodology allows managers to evaluate and present unambiguous measures to the person being appraised, while maintaining the organization's established standards for employee conduct and achievement. This process also gives the employee a set of clear, achievable goals to strive for in the future. This approach can be time consuming and cost prohibitive to create and implement and may suffer from gaps in positive behaviors exhibited by employees but not mentioned in the appraisal.
Outcome Appraisal
Here outcome and completion of targeted objectives or key performance indicators (KPI) are the metrics measured. One benefit of this system is that the metric being evaluated can be a concrete sales figure or a decrease in number of customer complaints, in other words, it can be easily and unequivocally understood and appraised. Thus, removing impartiality or individual manager’s variance in evaluation practices. Unfortunately, this process cannot properly evaluate a valuable employee who finds himself in an unproductive environment, such as network failure, economic instability, or reliance on an unproductive department.
Some quick tips for the evaluation interview
The performance appraisal can be a boon to both an organization’s performance and employee achievement. When prepared thoughtfully, with clear goals and fair metrics, it can elevate the work habits of struggling employees and push for greater excellence in top performers. Having clear, fair, and achievable goals to work toward can provide motivation and challenge for those experiencing burnout or boredom, and when coupled with a solid action plan, can correct all but the most severe performance issues.
Sources:
Bumgarner, J. A Performance Appraisal Horror Story (With A Happy Ending). (2017). [online] Cascadeemployersblog.com. Available at: http://www.cascadeemployersblog.com/salarytrends/a-performance-appraisal-horror-story-with-a-happy-ending [Accessed 16 Feb. 2017].
Gomez-Mejia, L., Balkin, D. and Cardy, R. (n.d.). Managing human resources. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, pp.231-260.
Sources:
Bumgarner, J. A Performance Appraisal Horror Story (With A Happy Ending). (2017). [online] Cascadeemployersblog.com. Available at: http://www.cascadeemployersblog.com/salarytrends/a-performance-appraisal-horror-story-with-a-happy-ending [Accessed 16 Feb. 2017].
Gomez-Mejia, L., Balkin, D. and Cardy, R. (n.d.). Managing human resources. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, pp.231-260.